This video discusses the Center for Open Science and their great work auditing peer-reviewed research studies to see if the results of those studies can be replicated. In a study of 100 psychology research papers, researchers could only replicate the results on 37% of the papers and in a second study focused on cancer biology, the average effect in the replicated study was 85% smaller than the original published study.
Is a part of a series about problems in science. The other videos are in a play list at the end of this video.
I am available as a speaker for your group or event. Please contact me through LinkedIn to discuss. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonpadfield/
Here are some useful links that I used while researching this video.
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/replication-crisis
https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/psn/2020/03/replication-crisis
https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/psychologys-replication-crisis-real/576223/
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21504366/science-replication-crisis-peer-review-statistics
https://www.cos.io/about/mission
https://osf.io/ezcuj/wiki/home/
#junkscience
#brokenscience
#replicationcrisis
#reproducibilitycrisis
#Centerforopenscience
