MM and HM argue about SEX WITH BOYS AND GIRLS.
Some intelligent people I respect questioned my decision to have this event (mostly “what do you have to gain?”), but I’m sure that I made a good choice anyway. I think this generated good discussion and showcased my ability to argue.
I think that Macken has a job and a corresponding position of influence that is highly unique and of significant value to the overall dialogue in our global society, and that I have gained overnight fame and influence without going through any conventional structures that issue approval of my ideas, and we disagree with each other on key points.
I think it’s very valuable for us to put flesh on that discussion and get to the root of what it is that he thinks is wrong with my message, and also for me to use my alarmingly powerful and yet somehow entirely untapped brain to laser focus on some things I’ve noticed about the logic and reasoning behind some of the calls he makes based on his data.
We didn’t get to everything I wanted to in this discussion, but I think that we both grew in understanding.
